Ask five people how the process works. Get five answers.
Every one of them is telling the truth. Nobody holds the whole of it, and every route to a truthful answer is already closed.
Ask your own people
Fifteen months of workshops, with the CEO in the room, and the distinction that mattered still surfaced in production, after the workshops designed to find it. Four senior answers, all sincere, all different.
Read your own documents
The SOP listed eleven email classifications; the team used six. The “30 GB” database was 132 GB. The documents describe the process as it was designed, not as it runs on a Friday afternoon.
Buy a tool for it
Mining reads every click and none of the logic, no judgment, no reason a decision was made. And a client-side install puts you behind an IT security review before it has shown you anything.
One product. Three steps. One handoff.
Evidence from your people becomes a ranked list of what to automate, and a runbook your builders can start from. Nothing installed to begin with.
Talk to everyone who touches invoice approval, this week, not next quarter.
Show me every process worth automating, ranked and priced, on one page.
Hand my team a spec they can build from, and the cases it has to pass.
This is the shape of the answer.
Every process on one field, ranked by volume, cycle time and automation fit. Every figure carries its confidence: observed, estimated or assumed. Nothing averaged away.
The opportunity view · sample company, every figure carrying how it is known
It finds the things nobody wrote down.
Maria has approved payouts over €50k by email for eleven years. Nobody had written it down. It isn't in the SOP, it isn't in NetSuite, and it would never appear in an event log, because the decision happens before anything is keyed in.
The graph surfaced it in the third interview, marked it disputed, and held it there until two more people confirmed it. It was never averaged away into a tidier answer.
That rule is now a guardrail in the claims agent, and Maria approves the edge cases.
“Large enterprises with tons of processes they don't understand that they wanna layer AI into them, you're giving them the tools to figure that out... I have not, frankly, seen anything like it.”
The bottleneck is never the build.
In every one of these, the money and the months went on working out what to build. The building itself took days, that gap is what Discovery closes.
Four promises. Only one of them is a certificate.
The rest are decisions about how the product works, which is the part a security review actually reads.
Compliant
27001
Hosting
SOC 2 Type II
Independently audited, end to end, discovery, the graph, and the agents that run from it. Not a single component in scope while the rest sits outside it.
No training on your data
Zero retention. Not by us, and not by our model providers, the same clause holds all the way down the chain, and it is in the contract rather than in a blog post.
Humans keep decision control
Agents prefill and propose; your people decide. Review points are defined during discovery, not bolted on when compliance asks.
No system access to begin
Discovery starts with interviews, not integrations. Access is earned later, when production data is actually needed, so nothing waits on a data project.
FAQ
Bauen Sie ein Unternehmen auf, das sich selbst weiterentwickelt
KI-Agenten, die aus jeder Interaktion lernen und sich eigenständig verbessern. Laden Sie Ihre Prozesse hoch, setzen Sie Produktionsagenten ein und sehen Sie, wie sich Ihre Abläufe verwandeln. Die neue Ära beginnt mit Ihrem ersten Agenten.